Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Car rental,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Last-Minute Deals
Travel Guides:
Las Vegas,
New York City,
Los Angeles,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Rome,
Paris,
Tokyo,
Minneapolis,
Phoenix,
Austin,
Charlotte,
San Diego,
Mexico City,
Copenhagen,
Sydney,
Bangkok,
Bogota,
Toronto,
Costa Rica,
Bermuda,
Puerto Rico
© 2012 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-27-2009 @ 4:54PM
byron said...
Carlos,
Your argument is even worse, that airport does very little in terms of contributing to the local economy, in fact it would have been better to have a $25 million airport and invest the other $175 million in better endeavors. The author mentions 20 passengers a day- that is an average over the course of a year so if you consider your point of increased travel through the airport in holidays then the adjusted average for "normal" days would be much less- If they had enough passengers then taxpayers wouldn't have to fork over $100 for every ticket to help cover costs. Business 101- anything that loses money and is a bad model should be shut down. Murtha is just another corrupt politician who has funded a monument to himself with taxpayer money and there is no fiscal way to justify this negligent use of MY taxes