Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Through the Gadling Lens: the most overrated photography-related items take on a trip
Every now and then, while I'm out in public, I'll see someone who clearly was seduced by the "coolness" of a camera-related item or gadget, but who clearly has no idea what it does. (A most recent case in point: at my daughter's Christmas recital, a man with an expensive SLR camera, a 300mm lens and a flash that was worth more than my car. Umm, excuse me, sir? You're focusing on something that is about a GYMNASIUM LENGTH AWAY. Your flash is doing absolutely nothing to help you with that shot. Really. It's not.) Similarly, while on a trip, I'll occasionally notice fellow tourists traveling with items that seem ... well, let's just say ... overkill for the purposes of a leisurely family vacation. So lest you get seduced by all the bells and whistles of various photography gadgets out there, I thought I'd share with you some of the items which, in my opinion, are completely useless when coming to photography when traveling on leisure (although, admittedly, there might be some uses for them in other photography applications. MIGHT be.)1. A photographer's vest. I know, I know -- when you watch a television adventure reality show, and you see the intrepid traveler on safari wearing his elaborate photographer's vest, there is just something about him that looks tragically hip and incredibly cool, right? And perhaps, if you happen to be a photographer for National Geographic, you'll be able to pull it off that look with aplomb. The thing is? Very few of us are National Geographic photographers. Furthermore, if you're walking around the beach at the resort in your laden photographer's vest, while the rest of us are sitting in our swimsuits drinking fruity drinks with little paper umbrellas floating in them, no one is going to believe you're a National Geographic photographer. Besides, those vests are heavy and sweaty. And often unintentionally broadcast the message "Mug me -- I'm carrying expensive camera gear, and God knows what else." Go ahead and leave them at home.
"But, Karen!" I hear some of you protesting, "I have to carry ... things! I need those pockets!"
Really, you don't. You can take a daypack like the rest of us. Or better still, just stick the lens cap in your swimsuit, shorts or cover-up pocket while you shoot. It'll be fine. Trust me.
2. A full-size tripod. I know I've mentioned in the past that there are some great uses for a tripod: particularly if you're shooting in low light, and don't want to pull out a flash. But have you ever looked at the size of a tripod? They're big. And they're somewhat heavy. And while they might actually fit under the seat in front of you (or in the overhead bin above your seat), they may not actually fit in your carry-on, and then you'll be over the carry-on-bag-number limit, and then where would you be? They're bulky, and annoying, and really, best left at home. You're not going to want to pull it out when you're on site, trust me.
Still, I will admit that there may be an occasion or two where you'd like to have the support of a tripod -- like, for example, if you're taking a photograph in a cave. In this case, I would strongly recommend grabbing a Gorillapod and throwing it into your carry-on bag. They're light, flexible, and can be used pretty much anywhere. It will definitely be all you need.
3. A GPS adapter for your camera. I'd never actually heard of these little gadgets until my husband clued me in: apparently these handy little systems allow you to "to 'geotag' your images with valuable information such as latitude, longitude, altitude and time information." Which, you know, sounds kind of cool until you look at the price: anywhere from US$ 150-220.
Um... excuse me?
Okay, pardon me for asking, but why would I possibly want to spend this kind of money on a gadget that, in theory, tells me exactly where I was and what time it was when I took the photograph? Wouldn't I already know that? And besides, most cameras -- both SLRs and point-and-shoots -- will already time stamp images. All I'd need to do when I got back in front of my computer is pull up Google Earth and input my location, and the application will spit out the associated latitude and longitude ... for free.
Again, I suppose it is possible that there are some professional photographers which will find this little tool invaluable -- the photographer assistant to Indiana Jones or some other archeologist or geologist, say -- but for those of us who are just taking beautiful pictures of picturesque places or stunning faces to remember, I'd say we should just save our money for a cool new lens, instead.
4. A removable flash. An admission before I begin: I am not particularly big on flash photography. I find that, in general, using a flash creates a clearly artificial light effect on the resulting image (undesirable unless you're sitting in a studio, or shooting a wedding); in addition, in most instances, a comfortable knowledge of ISO, shutter speed and aperture setting obviates the need for a flash altogether, anyway. I own quite a fancy flash, thanks to a generous husband who gave it to me as a Christmas gift several years ago, but the truth is that I can count the number of times on one hand that I ever actually used the thing. And I have never, ever taken it with me on a trip. Ever.
That is not to say, of course, that I haven't used the flash that is built-in on my camera -- in a pinch, I have resorted to popping that baby out. But I'm far more likely to just adjust the settings of my camera. The final result, in my opinion, is far more authentic.
So, there you have it. This of course, is not to say that there aren't valid reasons why certain specialized photographers wouldn't find the above gadgets and items useful -- or even invaluable -- but I do maintain that for the serious amateur who simply likes to take photographs when they travel, all of the above are rather ineffective, or, at the very least, noncritical. Greater minds may differ; and in fact, if you do, I'd love to hear it in the comments below. And as always, if you have any questions, you can always contact me directly at karenDOTwalrondATweblogsincDOTcom - and I'm happy to address them in upcoming Through the Gadling Lens posts.
Karen is a writer and photographer in Houston, Texas. You can see more of her work at her site, Chookooloonks.
Through the Gadling Lens can be found every Thursday right here, at 11 a.m. To read more Through the Gadling Lens, click here.
Filed under: Arts and Culture, Learning, Gear, Photos, What's in Your Pack?, Through the Gadling Lens










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Jeremy Kressmann Apr 23rd 2009 11:17AM
Good points about using the flash, Karen. I'm always amused at stadiums when I see everyone taking flash photos of the athletes down below.
People, your flash does nothing from that distance!
Willy Apr 23rd 2009 12:10PM
I sometimes take a tripod -- especially if I know I want to take sunset shots, it's invaluable. But I curse *every single minute* of it.
Kraig Apr 23rd 2009 12:15PM
The new version of iPhoto from Apple reads the geotag information directly and displays your photos right on a map. It can be used for organizational purposes and sharing with others exactly where something was taken. Pretty cool technology if you ask me. Not sure if it's worth another $200 though.
Bernard Siao Apr 23rd 2009 9:20PM
I'd have to disagree with your argument regarding the GPS data loggers. They can be had for around $45 on up. My particular model has more features and was $99. http://www.buygpsnow.com/data-logger_126.aspx. These are not the types you connect to your camera, but rather little car alarm remote sized devices you just turn on and keep in your bag or pocket.
Their usefulness, as a Gadlinger, is immeasurable. Sure you can geotag the photos yourself, and I used to do that, but it takes too much time to research exact locations on the map (emphasis on exact). And often times, I have no idea where I shot after coming back home. Do I know where exactly the Qutub Shahi Tombs are in Hyderabad? How about the underground caverns in Bohol? After uploading photographs to Flickr, any would-be traveler can find exact locations for their upcoming trip. Flickr, as a trip planning tool is outstanding by the way, due in large part to the geotaggers.
Craig Apr 23rd 2009 2:11PM
I also see the point in geo-tagging photos and I've been thinking about getting one, provided it doesn't add bulk to my camera or it can be stowed in a daypack. Bernard, which model do you have? How does it link each photo with a location if it's not attached to the camera? (Does it do this later, on your PC, by comparing the time the photo was taken with its logs?)
Audrey Apr 23rd 2009 12:54PM
Completely agree with you on the vest and tripod (although we do carry a monopod for 360-degree panoramas - http://www.360cities.net/image/udaipur2_rajasthan_india), but have to disagree on the GPS tracker. Perhaps if you're going to one place on your vacation and you don't actually use the functionality (i.e., you just embed the geodata but don't display on a map) then it's a waste of money and time.
But when a gps tracker and geotagged photos are used and displayed well, it can be pretty cool. This functionality allows us to show geographic context for a photo (via a Google Map) that's taken in places that most of our friends, family and website readers have no idea where they are located (e.g., Pamir Mountains, scroll to the bottom of the page: http://www.uncorneredmarket.com/photos/picture/1958390856/ )
My husband and I traveled for four months around Europe in 2000. When I scanned in the negatives a few years ago, I had forgotten the names of some of the castles and villages from France, Spain, Italy, etc. So on our current journey of 2+ years, having embedded geodata takes the burden off of me of keeping organized lists of every town, village and place we've been to. That's another selfish reason why I like this gadget :)
Fiznatty Apr 23rd 2009 1:19PM
The biggest issue with the vest is that it's too bulky to pack. This is important if you're backpacking or a more serious photographer who has to make room for more bodies and lenses. Plus, it's easy enough to carry a lot of the accessories you need (extra batteries, memory cards, etc.) in your pockets... as long as you remember to wear something with pockets.
I always take two pairs of "zippy pants" with me, those cargo pants with the legs that zip off. This not only saves on packing space (don't need shorts), but they're more comfortable than something like jeans and have plenty of pockets to stuff gear in. Also, you can pick up some nice photo belt-and-pouch systems these days which allow you to tote gear and accessories fairly comfortably without taking up backpack space (or getting in the way of your pack).
Max
Robert Teague Apr 23rd 2009 1:18PM
A good tripod is always worth taking, unless you plan on only being out in the heart of the day. If you find the weight to be an issue, a good carbon fiber tripod is readily available (although not cheap).
One of the biggest misconceptions I find amongst you digital photographers is this idea of cranking up the ISO. Raising the ISO increase noise, noise reduction reduces sharpness - especially for those who use cheaper consumer DSLRs like the Nikon D200/D300, etc. Try seeing ISO like a film photographer sometime, and you might find more creative ways of handling low light situations.
rsjames Apr 23rd 2009 1:55PM
As someone who makes part of his living from photography, I might have a different take on it, but I rarely travel anywhere without a flash and tripod (I have never owned a photo vest, and rarely have I wished for geotagging - I can see it being useful when you want to revisit a spot).
Now, my travel tripod is compact and carbon fiber, and none of my SLR bodies have a built-in flash. The tripod is great for capturing night scenes or longer exposures after sunset and blurring water (see yesterday's Photo of the Day as an example). As for flash, a good one can make artificial light look much more natural by bouncing and diffusing, and there are times when you need some fill (My wife and son on the beach with the setting sun in the background - no way you're going to make that look good without a flash).
Those two tools have helped me take some great photos on vacation, photos that I enjoyed taking, especially without the frustration of wishing for a tripod or flash that I didn't have.
Long Apr 23rd 2009 4:22PM
Hi Karen, sorry but i somewhat disagree with the last point, flash is a must accessory, the built in flash can be really limited.
Maybe you don't know about the Strobist movement, please do visit David Hobby's blog by just googling strobist. Off camera flash do wonders
Long Apr 23rd 2009 4:24PM
Also on the other note, the 300mm guy might have been using it with a flash x-tender (Better Beamer) which works really well
nismo334 Apr 23rd 2009 5:32PM
I also disagree with a flash being overrated, I think they are invaluable in some scenarios. I primarily shoot with a 40D so my camera has a 1.6x crop factor, but even still on my 16-35mm L lens the flash is not wide enough to cover the whole frame, instead I actually see a shadow of the lens in my shots with that lens and the on board flash. When you need wide and a flash you have to go external flash. I still avoid using flash like the plague because it's not as natural of lighting, but when the situation calls for it you shouldn't be afraid to pull it out and start flashing away.
Randall Kelley Apr 23rd 2009 6:11PM
Useless is in the eye of the beholder. While I agree on the "Photographers vest" being heavy, etc, I like an ultralight "travel vest" because even before the photo gear I'm running out of pockets. The advantage of more pockets over a bag is you can seperate and protect individual items, AND you can reach in and retrieve without digging around (if you don't over stuff). So some people might need that vest. Though, I agree on buying the lightest and most "non desrcipt" you can get for the very reasons you site as reasons not to use one at all.
On tripods, for 98% of my shooting I agree. However, if you like to do large panoramas or HDR ohotography, a gorillapod won't do. However, Bogen makes a couple of short tripods that have more sections to the legs that WILL fit in a carry on. I can highly recommend that as a nice alternative to lugging one that won't fit.
I agree with most of the commentors on the fun of geotagging, and in my case it was no extra expense. In my car or on my motorcycle I use a small handheld Garmin. I just clip it to the camers bag when traveling and sync with software when I download the photos. The software was cheap and I already had the GPS, why buy a seperate one just to get it an inch or two smaller and ounce or too lighter?
On flash, I too don't use it much. However, I would be willing to bet that there are people out there that are really good with it. I miss some shots that fill would have saved, but my on camera flash wasn't strong enough for. Or sometimes a traveler might want to "make like a wedding photographer" and then it would be usefull. I have done this when visiting realatives who couldn't afford a "pro" to do their wedding. I got OK shots for them with the built in (remember to remove the lens hood!) but could have done much better with a small external attached.
By and large, I'd say "things that might not serve everyone equally well" would be better a better title than "over rated". This is a list of NORMALLY dispensible items that are indispensable for CERTAIN shots. People SHOULD consider if they are worth it, and they should consider the drawbacks, but nothing is over rated if it happens to be the tool you REALLY NEED for the shot that you REALLY WANT.
Thanks for listening.
Randall Kelley
Barb Apr 24th 2009 1:59PM
I do a lot of hiking and sometimes find the need for a "full length" tripod. I don't have a large, heavy camera so I don't have to lug around an oversized tripod. I found a great lightweight (2 lbs) and inexpensive ($22.95) aluminum tripod at REI that I can throw in my daypack or backback and always have it with me for the picture that screams for a tripod. This works well with my Canon Powershot.
eileen May 11th 2009 2:34PM
so glad you don't think the remote control is foolhardy. It can be my best friend at times. And fun!
I seriously didn't know that people would wear those vests unless they were, I don't know... on a photo safari? Here in Santiago I only see them on photogs at protests and such.
And I have an external flash and use it only occasionally, but it's all about the weight-cash-results trifecta in the end.