Hot or not? JetBlue decides for flight attendant

JetBlue may not comment on litigation, as it told USA Today, but clearly flight attendant attire is fair game. The airline is being sued by Karin Keegan. In what appears to be the friendly skies' version of "put out or get out," Keegan was not allowed to board a JetBlue flight because she wasn't dressed provocatively enough. After ditching her threads for something she felt would be more consistent with JetBlue's unusual "standards," Keegan was told that she had missed her flight ... and that she should have dressed the part of a sexy flight attendant from the start.

Keegan was flying JetBlue because of an agreement the airline has with her employer (Delta), under which Delta employees are ferried among locations. The altercation occurred in October 2007. The flight attendant complained to the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission, which gave her a "right to sue" letter late last year. Though not an employee of JetBlue, the law gives her the right "sue over workplace harassment even when they are not directly employed by the alleged harasser," according to reporting by USA Today.

JetBlue's recent spanking in Connecticut small claims court is nothing compared to this debacle, which is headed for federal court. If the airline is looking for some form of precedent to cite, it may want to consider France's advances in attire and accommodation.

Maybe a scantily clad workforce is JetBlue's way of making a nine-hour stint on the runway more bearable for passengers, but c'mon guys, there has to be a better way.

[Via USA Today]

[Picture via The Sun]

---

Keegan wasn't provocative enough. Check out the stories from these women -- who were all too provocative!

Filed under: Activism, North America, United States, Airlines, News