Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-08-2009 @ 12:36PM
Dtjump said...
Basically, you don't trust the fuel gauges, you look at the fuel level. If its a bottom loader like most jets, then you follow-up with the ground crew on how much fuel they put into the a/c and then you check you gauges to make sure that you have adequate fuel for flight to your destination + 45 minutes reserve.
Sounds like that guy wasn't instrument rated. In the US, that would never happen. If you have an ATP rating, you also have an instrument rating and you have a commercial rating.
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 1:32PM
Billy said...
It doesn't mean he wasn't rated to fly by instruments, it means the pilot may not have received training for this specific aircraft. A pilot can be dual rated for different aircraft, and there are different category approaches that bring you down to lower ceilings and visibility. I am rated for category 3 approaches but I am not rated for cat 2 or cat 1 approaches, until next week when I go through the FAA approved training course for the comapny I fly for, and for the specific plane I fly.