Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-31-2008 @ 6:58AM
tese42s said...
I would of landed anyway.
Reply
12-31-2008 @ 8:11AM
cam said...
dude. he could have landed on a runway where another plane was taking off. they didn't know what to do.
12-31-2008 @ 10:26AM
Dorothy said...
You obviously have never flown a jet with over 150 people on it.
12-31-2008 @ 1:42PM
cal10pilot said...
You are exactly right. Look up in the FAR's, part 91.. under pilot in command & emergencies. If he had an alternate airport to go to, he could have elected to do that. If fuel was a concern.... well???? what would you do? Not break what you perceive to be 'law' and die in the crash? If you did, then there wouldn't be much of a fire... would there?