Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-26-2008 @ 2:43AM
Larry said...
How much are the speeds changed if these aircraft have maybe one quarter total fuel left in the tanks at landing. If I understand it correctly Maximum Landing Weight is very close to Max Gross Weight after some reduction of fuel load during run-up and takeoff and burn-off or dump as necessary. A few hundred thousand pounds of fuel would seem (weak layman's logic) to require more speed not to mention more runway. Is there much difference in the speed with tanks full as opposed to tanks one quarter full?
Reply
11-26-2008 @ 2:47AM
Kent Wien said...
Good point Larry.
Adjust most of those numbers down about 20 knots to get a ref speed for a very light aircraft. I know the 737-800 could see a ref of 128 knots when very light as opposed to the 148 knots at max landing weight.
The 757 requires about an extra knot for every 3000 pounds of weight.