Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Airfare watchdog's survey of how much would you pay to fly without kids?
In her New York Times travel column "Motherlode," Lisa Belkin recently wrote about flying with children. She titled it, "The Less-Than-Friendly-Skies."
As a person who once traveled with babies and young kids (according to her bio, her children are now teenagers) Belkin has sympathy for people who travel with children and mentions those who have problems with children on planes as "crotchety."
It's not that she isn't sympathetic to the plight of those who don't have kids with them who are on an airplane with folks who have brought their kids along, but she tends to feel more for the parents who have the kids--and the kids. She recalls the days back when airlines gave kids pilot wings and flight attendants had the time and energy to treat kids like special passengers instead of more work.
Belkin cites a survey at airfarewatchdog.com where people vote according to their travel preference when it comes to money and kids. How much money would you pay extra for a flight that doesn't allow kids on board?
At this point, only 38% would not pay more for a ticket. The higher the dollar amount, the lower the percentage would pay the extra cash. 20% would pay $10 more, but only 9% would pay more than $40. (For survey, click here.)
And who would those people be? Belkin thinks it's parents with young kids who would like to take a flight where they could actually have time to read a magazine.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Kevin Lee Allen Oct 5th 2008 6:05PM
Clearly people traveling with children should be charged additionally. It should not be the responsibility of the flying public to support the additional services required for traveling children.
Unruly, loud or misbehaving children should be treated as any passenger that behaves in an inappropriate manner and removed from the plane. Their names added to the no-fly list.