Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Car rental,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel Deals
Travel Guides:
Las Vegas,
New York City,
Los Angeles,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Rome,
Paris,
Phoenix,
Austin,
Charlotte,
San Diego,
Toronto,
Puerto Rico.
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-16-2008 @ 5:08PM
Indigo said...
That is absurd Secret Asain. It's not obscene to feed your child. The laws protect rights to do things not your right not to see it. If you don't want to see it then don't look. Babies need to be fed period. As a mother I am not going to not meet the basic needs of my child, which in doing I am preventing from screaming, because of some ridiculous prudish notion. Covering up with a dirty airline blanket on a potentially hot plane, when many babies will not feed undercover is not a reasonable option. If you do it's like putting up a sign announcing what you are doing anyway. It's just ridiculous that this is ever an issue. We are talking about feeding babies. How is it possible that there are people in this world who could be against that? Formula comes with risks that no person should feel they have to take for their child because of the comfort of others. Beyond that it's much harder to get on a plane these days. Eating being a human rights issue is just such a strange idea. It's a need. Don't interfere.