Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Plane Answers: When do pilots use the autopilot?
Welcome to Gadling's feature, Plane Answers, where our resident airline pilot, Kent Wien, answers your questions about everything from takeoff to touchdown and beyond. Have a question of your own? Ask away!Justin asks:
My question concerns the autopilot. During the course of a flight how often is it used? Are there times where it can not be used because of heavy turbulence and other weather phenomenon?
Great question, Justin.
First, I should describe the autopilot system in a jet. It's essentially a device that a pilot will program to climb, descend or hold an altitude while following a specified route of flight. The system also includes autothrottles, which maintain the speed of the airplane in cruise and adjust the power automatically for climbs and descents.
The autopilot in an airliner is really analogous to the cruise control feature in your car. Just as you wouldn't use your cruise control when leaving your driveway, we never use the autopilot for takeoff. In fact, there's a limitation on the 757 and 767 that doesn't allow the autopilot to be used below 1000 feet, after takeoff. Above that and it's the flying pilot's option if they'd like to use it.
I usually prefer to 'hand-fly' the airplane to about 18,000 feet before turning on the autopilot. We generally don't hand-fly after leveling as it becomes rather tedious after a while. And one sudden push of the yoke would cause the passengers to float toward the ceiling. Some airlines charge for this weightless experience, but our passengers tend to prefer a straight and level ride.
Some pilots will bring the autopilot on right after takeoff, and again, that's their option. When I first started flying commercially, we tooled around in a commuter airplane that didn't have an autopilot, so I sometimes crave a little stick and rudder time.
But there are times when the other pilot is busy making the PA or talking on the radio and you need to take a closer look at the weather radar up ahead or you're trying to decide what the best cruise altitude will be. In these cases, the moment you start getting busy, it's a good idea to get the autopilot on to reduce the workload for you and the non-flying pilot.
Some airplanes (I'm looking at you, 737-800) have a tendency to hunt or oscillate during climbs and especially descents. The airplane will go from 500 feet per minute down to 2500 feet per minute and back again before eventually stabilizing. This makes for a rather uncomfortable ride in the back and it's probably why many 737 pilots prefer to hand-fly most of the climbs and descents.
The autopilot can handle a significant amount of turbulence. There's no requirement to turn it off during the bumps, but if you feel it's not doing an effective job at holding an altitude or airspeed, then you're encouraged to 'click it off' using a thumb activated button on the control yoke and fly the airplane yourself.
There are times when the weather is below a certain level of visibility where airplanes must be flown using the autopilot. If the visibility is less than 1800 feet (550 meters) and the airport has the capability, we will still be able to land using the autopilot. In fact, the 757, 767 and the 777 can be flown down to a visibility of 300 feet (75 meters) with touchdown occurring without actually seeing the runway.
When we print out the current weather and it reports a low enough visibility to require an autoland you can just about read the disappointment on the flying pilot's face. Hand-flying the landing is the icing on the cake for pilots, and to fly all the way across the country only to be denied a landing takes some of the fun out of coming to work.
These autolandings (known as Cat III approaches in pilot-speak) also require more setup to fly, and a significant amount of monitoring to be sure the airplane is tracking correctly. We don't have to fly them very often--I think I only had two autolandings last year.
Have you ever been curious about what goes on at the pointy end of an airplane? Ask Kent and maybe he'll use your question for next Friday's Plane Answers feature.
Filed under: Plane Answers




Get a WordPress.com Blog



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Neil May 2nd 2008 12:23PM
Great post Kent!
Beverly Ewing May 2nd 2008 12:33PM
I have a follow up question. How does it work that the autopilot does the landing? Doesn't it have to be programmed for each flight? Do you know the exact runway you'll be landing on at the destination airport before you leave the departure airport in order to program the autopilot? Or does air traffic control communicate with the autopilot in some way?
Thanks.
Kent Wien May 2nd 2008 6:10PM
Good question. The Cat III autoland feature works using three autopilots engaged at the same time while tracking an ILS (instrument landing system). Think of an ILS as a radio beam that the airplane tracks while on the final approach. This really only applies for the last 3 to 4 miles or so.
ATC simply clears you for the approach, after which you engage the three autopilots and intercept the ILS.
The programming happens much closer into the airport after you are told which runway is in use.
Paul Cummins May 3rd 2008 11:54AM
Just like to clarify a few points:
Many modern but slightly older aircraft do not have auto-throttles even though have sophisticated autopilots.
Some airlines encouraging use of auto-pilot from 1000ft after takeoff until near landing due to inexperience of crew to minimise work load and risk.
The "hunting" described relating to climb (and descent as well) is generally in turbulence and can be overcome by selecting "Pitch" mode on the autopilot rather than a speed on climb or rate of descent on descent. Works really well and there is no need to hand-fly and passengers get a smoother ride than hand-flying or using other modes on the autopilot.
Aircraft without an autoland can fly an precision instrument approach (ILS) down to 200ft above ground level on auto-pilot.
Kent Wien May 3rd 2008 2:53PM
Hi Paul,
I've tried every mode in the 737-800 and I've never been able to get it to stabilize on descent, except for vertical speed. This isn't the case with the 757, 767 or 777 though. The autopilots in those airplanes are extremely smooth.
>>Some airlines encouraging use of auto-pilot from 1000ft after takeoff until near landing due to inexperience of crew to minimise work load and risk.>>
Two schools of thought there. I'd encourage co-pilots to hand fly approaches (especially visual approaches) if they're inexperienced. But if workload doesn't permit it, then certainly, use the level of automation you're comfortable with.
It's true many aircraft with sophisticated autopilots don't have autothrottles. This is very often the case in the latest corporate jets. It doesn't apply to any Boeings or Airbus products, though.
Thanks for taking the time to point out some other points of view. There's always more than one way to do it, and I can only refer to the aircraft I fly at the company I work for. So it's nice to hear what others are doing.
Gareth May 4th 2008 9:21PM
Hi Kent - First time I've had a chance to get to the site. Great column, great insights. Quick follow up question - are all runways at all airports CAT III certified? I had heard that this isn't the case, hence the seemingly inconsistent diversions due to viz (I'm thinking of our beloved Logan here!) Gareth
Kent Wien May 6th 2008 8:42AM
Hi Gareth,
You're right. In Boston we only have one Cat III runway. On a recent Miami trip;
http://www.gadling.com/2008/02/04/cockpit-chronicles-miami-closed-youre-pulling-my-leg/
we ended up holding due to the lack of a Cat III runway and ILS at Miami. But who would ever imagine 1/16th of a mile visibility in Miami?
FatChick May 6th 2008 3:51PM
I think a better name for this would be "Poll the Pilot." Just my 2 cents.