Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Cockpit Chronicles: How pilots stay proficient
Last week I accomplished something every pilot dreads. Every nine months we have to go down to Dallas for recurrent training. The FAA lays out its mandates for airline recurrent training and the specific airlines design their courses around these requirements. It seems like every year they're adding more and more subjects that need to be covered. Whether it's in the classroom or in the simulator, there's a lot of information packed into the four days.Fortunately I was scheduled to fly down the day before which makes it easier to get a good nights sleep. This extra sleep helps me stay awake during some of the required classroom training which isn't that exhilarating. There's just no way to jazz up a course on hazardous materials paperwork or the proper use of a halon fire extinguisher.
The hotel was very basic and included a view of the roller coasters from the Six Flags over Texas amusement park. I think they're shut down during the winter, though. The free continental breakfast and WiFi made it easy to overlook any other shortcomings of the hotel.
The training lasts four days and includes two days of ground school and two days of simulator training.
Day 1 - International School
There were only six of us in a classroom that seats 30 people on the first day, in which we covered international flying for 4 1/2 hours. The instructor reviewed the procedural differences in flying across the Atlantic versus the Pacific and touched on some of the requirements for flying over the North Pole, even though it's unlikely the airplane I fly will ever go in that direction. The class also covered flying in South America which we'll hopefully see more of from our Boston base. After class it was time to go back to the hotel and study some more for the next day.
Day 2 - Ground SchoolThe next day there were eight of us in a different classroom listening to an instructor go over some of the 757 and 767 specifics. It was a good review that included a look into the hydraulic system, electrical system, flight instruments, air conditioning and pressurization, among other topics. Our cockpits are being retrofitted with large LCD type screens that will include a number of advancements. As you can imagine, I love gadgets, so I'm looking forward to flying an airplane with these displays installed in them.
While walking back from the cabin simulators where we operated the main cabin and emergency exit doors, I saw a group of flight attendants getting ready to go down the emergency exit slides. Pilots have to go down these slides as well when they're first hired. When our new-hire class made the leap, our instructor wasn't as versed in the operation of this 'slide simulator' and we all went sailing down the chutes. It wasn't until the last person finished that a flight attendant instructor, who happened to be walking by, told us that the slide needed to be inflated. No wonder it felt like we were falling straight to the ground!After lunch we went to a class on security that both pilots and flight attendants attend, and then we finished the day off with human factors training. This is an interesting class where we look at some of the mistakes other pilots have made based on their safety debriefs. These reports help us find better procedures and training to avoid getting into a similar situation. The situations are often recreated and filmed in a simulator to highlight the message. The goal is to recognize the mistakes that happen and to learn how to stay out of that kind of situation in the first place. It's a serious class and the messages aren't soon forgotten.
Day 3 - Simulator Training
When I was 15, my dad was an instructor pilot for another airline. Thanks to him, I had the rare opportunity to fly a full motion 737 simulator two different times. Both events were the highlight of my life to that point. When there's absolutely no pressure to perform, these things can be great fun.
A Sim-P, or simulator pilot, who's usually a retired military or other airline pilot, conducts the simulator training. We have a number of former Braniff pilots in this position and they're absolutely fantastic instructors. These instructors run you through some maneuvers, approaches and any new procedures in preparation for your checkride the next day.After a two hour briefing on some of the maneuvers we'd be doing, including low visibility landings, engine failures and fires, single engine approaches and go-arounds, we finally went into the simulator.
You need to be a bit of an actor in a simulator. There are lines to memorize and actions to perform, and you need to know these seldom used litanies without fail. Combine this with a look at your aircraft systems and procedures knowledge and it's easy to see why it's not exactly a video game for airline pilots.
The most common maneuver we practice is called the "V1 Cut." It's an engine failure at the worst possible moment, just as the airplane is ready to lift off from the runway. After liftoff, the jet tends to pull toward the failed engine which requires a significant--40 pounds maybe--amount of foot pressure on the rudder toward the side of the good engine. While you're trying to keep the airplane straight and level, the non flying pilot needs to contact ATC to declare an emergency and let them know where you want to go. The airplane climbs nicely to about 600 feet before we accelerate and bring the flaps up. The flying pilot then makes their callouts (the acting part) which are "continuous power, flight level change, set speed, let's have the engine fire, severe damage, separation emergency checklist," and then climbs to a safe altitude.
The non-flying pilot accomplishes the checklist which takes at least five minutes to get through. The flying pilot talks to air traffic control and works their way back to the runway. A fantastic video of a 757 in this situation was taken last year in Manchester, England.
For both the training and the simulator checkride, I was paired up with a Captain from L.A. named Mike who really knew his stuff. He was relaxed, yet professional and he was never in a hurry. This is the perfect kind of guy to fly with when everything falls apart (as often happens in a simulator). Apparently Mike and I put on a good enough show during the 4-hour training session to be signed off for our 'checkride' the next day.
Day 4 - The Checkride

The checkride also starts out with a 2-hour briefing followed by 4 hours in the simulator. After questions about some of the limitations and immediate action items we're required to know, we talked about some new procedures. The check-airman spent a good portion of this time discussing a new GPS based approach we're flying into Quito, Ecuador.
After a short break we went into the simulator and got everything ready as if it were a normal flight. The sounds and feel inside are very similar to the actual airplane. We wear our seat belts, not only to get the full effect, but because the box tends to move around quite a bit in a realistic way during these maneuvers.
Mike flew first, accomplishing an automatic landing, aborted takeoff, engine failure on takeoff followed by an engine out approach. I went next with a flaps up landing, an engine failure on takeoff and one on landing, a couple of different types of approaches to landings and a ground evacuation. I'm sure I'm leaving some things out, but they all tend to blend together after a few hours. We took turns flying a recovery from a microburst and also a very aggressive terrain avoidance maneuver. Two skills you hope to never find yourself needing. We then flew two GPS approaches--one in each direction--into Quito.
At the end of the session we usually get a few maneuvers that are as close to having fun as we'll ever get in the simulator. Often the instructor will fail both engines (almost always, for some reason, in Salt Lake City) and expect us to make it to the runway. There are bonus points given if you can coast to the gate. Or we might get to land in a 30-knot crosswind with the runway reported as having nil braking action. Something we'd never attempt in a real airplane. It's often a sign that things went well during the checkride when the check-airman gives you some of these scenarios.
It's a great feeling to ride home, even in the back of an MD-80, knowing that you're good to go for another nine months.
I'm on reserve this month, so I'm not sure when and where I'll be flying next. Stay tuned to the Cockpit Chronicles to find out.
Cockpit Chronicles takes you along on each of Kent's trips as a co-pilot on the Boeing 757 and 767 out of Boston.
Filed under: Airlines, Transportation, The Cockpit Chronicles












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Bill Volk Mar 15th 2008 11:39AM
What a great feature--well-written and very informative; I look forward to the "Chronicles" each time I visit Gadling. Keep it up!
Justin Glow Mar 15th 2008 12:06PM
I'm amazed at how real the simulator looks. For some reason, I pictured a Microsoft FlightSim setup with a couple of big screen monitors and a captain's chair, but this looks as close to reality as it can be. Very cool.
Kent Wien Mar 15th 2008 1:04PM
Yeah, unfortunately Justin, they run about 10 to 20 million dollars. Sometimes the company raffles off an hour in them for charity. Give it a try!
Neil Mar 15th 2008 2:08PM
Great read Kent! Those LCD screens give the 75/76 cockpit a modern look.
Out of interest, and I'm sure this has never happened to you :) , but if a pilot was to fail the checkride, what would happen to them? Retraining?
Thanks
Kelsey Mulyk Mar 15th 2008 6:09PM
All those screens and buttons make me nervous..you pilots have to memorize so much stuff. How long have you been flying for? Did you always want to be a pilot?
Kent Wien Mar 19th 2008 8:34PM
Remember, Kelsey.
It's far more dangerous to, say, drive from Canada to the southern tip of South America than it is to fly!
(Kelsey is chronicling her trip on Gadling)
http://www.gadling.com/category/no-wrong-turns/
I've been flying commercially for 19 years, 15 of which have been at my current employer.
I'm enjoying your 'trip reports!'
Ben Mar 15th 2008 11:11PM
Regarding the Day 1 stuff... What exactly are the procedural differences in flying over the Pacific vs. Atlantic? Also, What are the requirements for flying over the North Pole? Lastly, are there routes that fly over the South pole?
As always, this was a great article, thanks for the info!
Kent Wien Mar 16th 2008 11:28AM
Without boring you with too many details, the Pacific 'tracks' never change, while the North Atlantic Tracks are drawn up twice a day.
Polar flying uses some procedures that are limited to the 777, so I'm not really qualified to comment on them, but I was surprised to see that two heavy duty parkas are included on these airplanes for crews to use while outside doing a walk-around inspection if they divert somewhere extremely cold.
There aren't any flights crossing the South Pole as far as I know. Good question, though.
MaxFilbert Mar 18th 2008 8:29PM
I've spend my hours in the "Sim" as the non flying guy in a F-4E Phantom fighter bomber. When the day came for me to make a real world nose high, low airspeed recovery resulting from bird strike that temporarily blinded my front seater, I knew exactly what to do. Calmly recovered the aircraft to level flight, informed ATC, diverted to the nearest suitable airfield, and was ready land when my pilot came around (he never lost consciousness). Simulators can be boring but they work!
Kent Wien Mar 19th 2008 8:25PM
Wow, great story. Thanks Max!
Milimo Thindwa Mar 16th 2008 4:24PM
question for you kent:
what happens if a pilot does not successfully complete their recurrent training? i love your posts by the way mate! great read
Gail Mar 16th 2008 6:46PM
Ken, my boyfriend and I really enjoy your journal.He is with a pilot BA and, until recently, on their 777 fleet. Your blog eeriely parallels some of his doings, often just in reverse. For instance, a "good" trip for him is a 4-day to New York! And just in time for your entry on training, he is in deep-simulator mode in a conversion course to the Aribus! I learn a lot about the aviation industry from him, but I love reading your perspective!Keep it up!
Kent Wien Mar 16th 2008 8:21PM
I've always wondered what the 'senior' trips were for them. Thanks for the note. And good luck to him in the Airbus school! I was on the 777 for a month before getting bumped off during our last period of shrinking. It was fun while it lasted!
Jeff Mar 16th 2008 6:44PM
to help kent with a question. i'm retired from another airline and a little out of touch but when someone flunks a simulator check they got some 1 on 1 with an instructor. then they would either be scheduled for a 2nd check ride or they might get a practice session first, then the check ride. if they fail the 2nd check, the faa got involved. the individual might get another practice sim, but the faa would be there for the third attempt. if that was failed license action could be taken and poof no job. most airlines do a good job of hiring people that have the experience to handle the job. most of the time when what i have described above occurrs, it is a pilot trying to check out as a first time captain, especially if it is in an airplane he/she has not flown before. to finish up usually they will be returned to first officer status for 6 months before they try captain status again. all of this sounds a little strange, but occasionally there are pilots out there that fly a nice airplane, know the book and procedures. they do a nice job as first officer because they have a captain telling them what do at all times. this is rare, but some folks don't have any common sense. when they try to move to the captain's seat we find out that they can't think for themselves and fly at the same time.
kent: any relation to noel (i think) the famous alaskan bush pilot?
Kent Wien Mar 16th 2008 8:18PM
Thanks Jeff for that explanation. I couldn't have said it better, and you saved me some time!
Yes, Noel was my grandfather. Thanks for asking.
Fonawah Atang Mar 17th 2008 9:12AM
Thank you again for a great read. Keep it up. Very inspirational.
Alfredo Perilla Mar 17th 2008 8:29PM
Hi Kent,
Glad your sim sessions went well. I´m a pilot who lives in Quito but is based in Guayaquil...I´m eager to shoot those RNAV approaches. We´re finishing up our RNAV APP training and should be doing them towards the end of the year!
Great Blog!
Saludos,
SEQU
Kent Wien Mar 19th 2008 8:29PM
Thanks Alfredo!
I hope to get a chance to do that approach someday!
Kent
James Mar 19th 2008 4:34AM
Qantas is planning a SYD-EZE flight which will go near Antartica http://www.qantas.com.au/regions/dyn/au/publicaffairs/details?ArticleID=2008/mar08/Q3739 and is about as close as any scheduled flight will get http://gc.kls2.com/cgi-bin/gc?PATH=SYD-EZE%0D%0ASYD-SCL%0D%0ASYD-JNB (also shown: SYD-SCL and SYD-JNB) given no-one's going to fly from PER to South America.
Richard Mar 27th 2008 8:03AM
Richard wonders.....With your engine out situation in a real world high traffix airport, it seems a third man would be a great cockpit asset?
Ricjard...