Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Car rental,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Last-Minute Deals
Travel Guides:
Las Vegas,
New York City,
Los Angeles,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Rome,
Paris,
Tokyo,
Minneapolis,
Phoenix,
Austin,
Charlotte,
San Diego,
Mexico City,
Copenhagen,
Sydney,
Bangkok,
Bogota,
Toronto,
Costa Rica,
Bermuda,
Puerto Rico
All contents copyright © 2003-2009, Weblogs, Inc. All rights reserved
Gadling is a member of the Weblogs, Inc. Network. Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Notify AOL
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-06-2008 @ 6:51PM
Mikael said...
Before people start to moan about empty flights they should learn a bit more about how airlines work. An aircraft carries two types of payload: passengers and cargo. Depending on the passenger loading the remaining payload capacity is being used for cargo, which essentially allows airlines to turn passenger aircraft into cargo aircraft. Put simply: thanks to "payload-range" charts (and nowadays loading software) operators can easily replace passengers with cargo so they don't have to fly aircraft empty.
Considering the 777 has a maximum payload capacity of 55 tons at least 54 tons would have been available for cargo. Due to space issues not all of it would have been used but that would still mean about 30 tons of cargo...
Since 30 tons of cargo + passengers is not near the full load the aircraft wouldn't fly with maximum fuel (no point carrying 50 tons of fuel you're not going to use)so in the end the fuel consumption works out to be a lot less per kilogram payload than the environmentalists try to make it sound like...
Reply