Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Car rental,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel Deals
Travel Guides:
Las Vegas,
New York City,
Los Angeles,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Rome,
Paris,
Phoenix,
Austin,
Charlotte,
San Diego,
Toronto,
Puerto Rico.
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2012 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-25-2008 @ 12:44PM
Bill said...
This new plane, if built, will not fly in the same flight patterns as the average commercial passenger or military aircraft. This type of aircraft typically flys at high altitudes, on the edge of space where the atmosphere is thin. Therefore, no need to worry about trivial concerns like birds ingesting and excess fuel consumption. With little air resistance, fuel consumption is minimal. Most likely, less than that of the Airbus A 380. Odd, no one is complaining about the amount of fuel that huge plane consumes.
As far as the discomfort of flying on the SST... Have you tried Northwest Airlines? The seats push against your knees and hold you there until you disembark, if you're able to when you arrive. After one cross-country flight with that Co; Never again!