Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-08-2008 @ 4:15PM
Axella said...
Regarding airplane seats - I was stuck on a plane once, next to a 300 pounder... His fat spilled over into my seat area, and I had to sit for 6 hours with this guy's belly and thigh blubber squishing me. Very unpleasant. When someone gets to that size, morbidly obese where they really do require two seats (but only buy one), they should be made to sit in special larger seats which cost more money because not only would it be fair for the people stuck sitting next to them - it also becomes a weight and balance issue for the airplane. People that size equal a person plus two baggage allowances - in addition to the baggage they're normally allowed. So while I have to pay $100 in "excess baggage" fees to bring my guitar along when, as a musician, I need to, this person carries the equivalent of several guitars, in blubber, free-of-charge. Not fair. When people check in, they should have to stand on the scale with their luggage.
I'm not anti-fat people - I could stand to lose a few lbs, but thankfully, I can still be contained in one seat. I would be ashamed if I couldn't, and mortified at the thought of squashing another person for an entire flight.