Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Car rental,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Last-Minute Deals
Travel Guides:
Las Vegas,
New York City,
Los Angeles,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Rome,
Paris,
Tokyo,
Minneapolis,
Phoenix,
Austin,
Charlotte,
San Diego,
Mexico City,
Copenhagen,
Sydney,
Bangkok,
Bogota,
Toronto,
Costa Rica,
Bermuda,
Puerto Rico
All contents copyright © 2003-2009, Weblogs, Inc. All rights reserved
Gadling is a member of the Weblogs, Inc. Network. Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Notify AOL
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-02-2007 @ 2:55PM
Eva said...
Most Muslim scholars I've seen interviewed on the subject are in agreement that the Sudanese courts do NOT have a valid point, because under sharia law intent is a decisive factor in any conviction for insulting religion. Since everyone - aside from a few crazies who are convinced that Ms. Gibbons is part of a global conspiracy - agrees that this was a mistake on her part, she should not have been convicted.
This isn't a case of Westerners trying to impose our values on the Sudan to protect a culturally-ignorant visitor - this is a case of the Sudanese government flouting even their own judicial traditions, for reasons of their own - reasons that I would assume are directly related to their ongoing propaganda campaign painting any possible foreign intervention in Darfur as neo-colonialism.
It's scary stuff. Thanks for posting about it.
Reply