Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-08-2007 @ 12:22AM
anonymous said...
Regarding the previous statement; I was just recently in Karabakh and I know as a fact that there was no burning of anything. I am not Armenian but see the Armenian cause no different from that of Kosovo. It may be my "American Ignorance", however it seems that after some heavy research, Azerbaijan seems to have started the war, and that up until 1992 or 93 the Armenians were simply trying to keep Azeri and soviet forces from looting and pillaging their homes.
This opinion is only from a novice of the war and I know little but what I researched and learned in Karbakh and would love to hear the perspective of the previous commentator.
Also from what I have read, you are correct regarding the Caucasian Albanians who lived in the area, however the area was under Armenian or Persian control for hundreds of years at a time. And from what I have seen in karbakh there seems to only be beautiful churches however bombed out they are. I witnessed very little evidence of Azerbaijani presence there.
Oh and Lastly yes Karabakh is safe to travel to there is nothing to fear regarding your safety.
Reply