Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-27-2007 @ 2:28AM
Sqaaak said...
Why not retain the existing Waterloo Eurostar Terminus, and have both termini available, so that passengers from both the Waterloo area (including govt offices!) and the Northern, St. Pancras side of London can be served? This would seem an excellent solution!
Merely moving the location to St. Pancras, and depriving the whole of the Central/South/West End — a vast constituency! — seems a flaky and cheap idea, for all that the St. Pancras loop may be, trackwise, better suited to HS operation.
In any event, at some point in the future — nearer than further, one would hope, assuming a certain degree of intelligence on the part of politicians and planners — the Waterloo Eurostar Terminus will have to be upgraded to HS operation, so why not retain it?!
Is it a budget thing?
There's a saying...buy cheap, GET cheap.
Reply