Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-25-2006 @ 4:33PM
Deborah said...
(Some of) You guys--if you bothered to read the criteria, you'd see why the place is included on the list.
* The size of the affected population
* Severity of the toxin or toxins involved
* Impact of children's health and development
* Evidence of a clear pathway of contamination
* Existing and reliable evidence of health impact
So the combination of all of the above got the places listed. There is no where on this earth that man hasn't polluted from the north and south pole to Greenland, Northern Canadan or Patagonia and everywhere in between. It is scarey what we are doing to the world that are children will inherit. And if global warming comes true--then we may not have to worry, because there won't be a world for them to live in!
Reply