Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Car rental,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Last-Minute Deals
Travel Guides:
Las Vegas,
New York City,
Los Angeles,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Rome,
Paris,
Tokyo,
Minneapolis,
Phoenix,
Austin,
Charlotte,
San Diego,
Mexico City,
Copenhagen,
Sydney,
Bangkok,
Bogota,
Toronto,
Costa Rica,
Bermuda,
Puerto Rico
© 2012 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-18-2005 @ 5:01PM
Michael S. said...
Both the Wikipedia and everything2 have good entries on the Peters Projection, explaining that there are good reasons for why the Mercator projection is the standard projection. (They also counter the suggestion of Peters Projection advocates that the Mercator projection is standard for political reasons.) One advantage of the Mercator projection is that angles on the map equal angles in real life--with the Peters projection, this is only true N-S and E-W. Under the Peters projection, Africa appears to be twice as long N-S and E-W whereas in reality, the distances are about the same. So I think it's debatable whether the Peters projection shows the world as it "actually looks like" any more than the Mercator projection does.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peters_projection
http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=969034
Reply